Arthritis Case Reports
November, 1999
Meridian Institute, 1853 Old Donation Parkway, Suite 1
Virginia Beach, VA 23454
(757) 496-6009
Seven individuals participated in a 10-day live-in
instructional/treatment program in November, 1998, in which they were taught
the elements of the Edgar Cayce therapies for arthritis. One person had
rheumatoid arthritis, and six had osteoarthritis. Rheumatoid arthritis
is characterized by inflammatory changes in the synovial membranes of the
joints and the areas around the joints, and by atrophy and rarification
of the bones. In osteoarthritis there is generally no inflammation and
no spreading or migratory type of joint involvement. Rather than a loss
of calcium, there is a calcium build-up. The Cayce readings identify a
number of factors as playing a part in the development of both types of
arthritis. These include poor elimination and assimilation, and chemical
imbalances. The therapeutic approach in the project was a complementary
one, based on the information in the Cayce readings. The project explicitly
did not require participants to change their current therapies or medications.
The principal therapies included dietary changes, massage, Atomidine (an
iodine supplement), and epsom salts baths. The participants then returned
home to continue these therapies for six months, submitting daily logs
of compliance with the protocol.
Arthritis symptoms were evaluated at the beginning
of the program and after six months. Four of the seven people returned
for the six-month follow-up in May, 1999. One was unable to attend the
April session, and returned in November. Another responded to a questionnaire
by mail, and one person dropped out of the study.
Of the six participants who submitted information,
three had excellent compliance with the protocol. One felt "much improved,"
and two felt "improved." Two people had poor compliance, doing little or
none of the protocol after the initial conference. Of these, one rated
herself as "improved," and one as "worse." The remaining participant rated
herself as "much improved," but switched from the Cayce protocol to another
plan of therapy in the middle of the project, so it is difficult to know
what might be responsible for her healing.
Below are case reports based on the initial questionnaires
and the six-month follow-up questionnaires. Comments from letters and interviews
are included as well.
Case 1
Case 1 is a 61-year-old massage therapist. Her arthritis
symptoms began 11 years before. She initially described her symptoms as
"Overall I'm in good health, but have sore hips, low back and especially
stiff fingers with limited flexibility." Her compliance with the protocol
was very good most of the time. She was not able to return for the six-month
follow-up; her questionnaire by mail indicated that she was feeling somewhat
worse at that time. However, she continued with the protocol, and returned
at one year, reporting some improvement.
On the Osteoarthritis Symptom Assessment, her initial
score was 18, and her score at six months was 15, a 3 point improvement.
Her initial score on the Activity Assessment was 28, and her score at six
months was 24, a 4 point improvement. She did not fill out these assessments
when she returned at one year, but reported that her arthritis symptoms
were "improved," and her symptoms other than arthritis were "improved."
She felt that her arthritis was "less disabling," and that her attitudes
and emotions were "much improved."
Regarding compliance with the protocol, she followed
the diet "most of the time," received massage "A few times a month," and
followed the Atomidine/Epsom salts bath/massage sequence consistently about
once per month. She also received four or more spinal adjustments. This
is very good compliance with the protocol.
Case 1 was unable to return for the six-month evaluation,
but she continued with the protocol, and returned six months later. In
a 12-month interview in November, 1999, she said:
The first 6 months I was probably a little more
attentive to my procedures and I think I kept better records. However,
I don't think that I followed them as well as I could. I think I did a
fairly good job with following the routine.
Then I kind of slacked off for a couple of months,
and I did notice a difference from slacking off, from the first 6 months.
Now I've started again, but I've been traveling and it's been a little
difficult.
But, overall I feel better. My judgment for the
arthritis may be a little different from someone else's. When I wake up
in the morning my hands are stiff. As the day goes on, it limbers out and
I feel better.
But once in a while the knuckle will get a sharp
pain in it. It doesn't happen very often, and I correlate this to what
I did the day before. There is a correlation, definitely.
Generally, I have more energy, just from the diet.
I've been pretty good about the diet.
A year ago it was not only my hands, but also
my hips and the general soreness of the whole body, and now it's just the
hands. The hips feel much better.
Sometimes when I have a little flare-up and feel
sore all over, I'll take something over-the-counter.
When I started the program, I thought, my arthritis
at that point was not too bad, and as a massage therapist I didn't want
it to get any worse. I thought, let's catch this before it gets too bad.
After the 6 months it felt better, not as much
as I would like to, but who knows what the reason is exactly. I'm still
staying with the diet. Today this hand feel fairly good, this one is a
little stiff but not too bad. The hips feel good. I have no trouble walking,
never had.
It hasn't progressed, and that's what I was really
concerned about. If I can stay where I'm at, and hopefully get better.
Case 2
Case 2 is an 62-year-old massage therapist. Her arthritis
symptoms began approximately 50 years before, when she was a teenager.
Her symptoms included periodic inflammation/swelling of finger joints,
morning stiffness in her hands and feet, chronic back pain, and periodic
epicondylitis.
Case 2 must be considered separately, because although
she reported substantial improvement in arthritis symptoms, she did not
follow the protocol. Her case is a good example of two problems: 1) in
a complementary medicine project, some people will likely add or remove
other treatments that may have an effect on the results, and 2) some people
will inevitably need to treat other medical conditions that arise during
the course of the project, interfering with the original study. She had
a heart condition, which worsened during the six months. A psychic reading
unrelated to the protocol suggested that she drop the protocol and concentrate
on working with the heart condition. We would likely have given the same
advice.
Her improvement was evident in her Osteoarthritis
Symptom Assessment, where her score went from 14 in November to 10 in May,
and her Activity Assessment, where her score went from 9 in November to
0 in May, indicating no major impairment in quality of life. As noted above,
however, this improvement cannot be attributed to our protocol.
In the 6 month interview in May, 1999, she explained
her other medical problems in detail, as well as the information she received
from her psychic reading:
From the time I left here in November until March
10, this year, I had been experiencing increased pain in the left proximal
joint of the pinkie finger, and in the medial epicondyles of both arms
and also in the heels of both feet. On March 10 I was shoveling snow, and
got very unusual sensations. Some sort of a ball of energy erupting in
my chest which caused the calfs to immediately cramp. And then it felt
like my lower legs belonged on somebody else's body. Unusual electrical
flashes in the head. Strange sensation across the chest from shoulder to
shoulder. Which was not pain, just very unusual feelings.
I had an appointment for a bone density at the
University and I kept it. When I arrived they immediately did a blood pressure,
and it was 178/110. So they did a cardiogram which showed some erratic
things and shipped me across the road to the hospital via ambulance.In
the emergency room the blood pressure, EKG and blood enzymes were normal.
But since this had happened to me about 2 years previous, my home doctor
requested that I be kept overnight..I was sent home, but then ended up
back in the ER.
I had the tests, which indicated a left branch
block. The next day I ended back up in the ER, and had a heart catheterization.
The results of the tests are that the blood vessels are normal, the heart
is normal, the circulation is normal, and it was strictly electrical.
The cardiologists didn't give any reason why,
and wanted to prescribe tranquilizers and antidepressant drugs, which I
didn't feel was something I wanted to get into. My chiropractor indicated
that the problem emanated from a compression of the vertebrae in the cervical
and upper thoracic spine.My osteopath who is my general physician agreed
with that assessment. He suggested I see another osteopath for acupuncture.
I have been doing acupuncture once a week, chiropractic adjustment once
a week, and osteopathic manipulation which was somewhat different once
a week. I'm also taking, in addition to Lopressin, a beta blocker which
the cardiologist had suggested., I have since stopped taking that. I haven't
taken it in about 7 or 8 days. I am taking a homeopathic antiarrthyhmic
remedy also, a homeopathic lymph support, and I'm taking arsenicum LM3
once a day. The combination of these things have considerably eased off,
as of May 9th, Mother's day, I spent 30 minutes in the garden, and that
was about the extent of what I could. And I'm presently (May 21) walking
now more than a mile each way, about 2 miles. I feel that I'm really coming
back into my own. Heart arrhythmia has real leveled off, balanced out.
The chest pain has eased considerably.
I had a psychic reading done in the middle of
this.completed on March 20. It supported the chiropractor's assessment.
It also gave specific instructions for the chiropractor, for massage, for
an oil, and requested that I stop all my supplements and then suggested
other supplements. It also told me to stop the arthritis protocol immediately,
stating that the arthritis was an old memory that I had already put to
sleep. Dwelling on, etc., was only bringing it to the forefront of the
mind again.
Almost immediately I lost all pain sensation in
those areas that had been considered arthritic. At this point I really
feel that I'm coming back into my own. I lost all pain sensation in hands,
elbows, feet. A day or two after I received the reading, about March 26.
I stopped all the recording for the project.
I do not have the problems that I had at the beginning
of the protocol at all. I just have a slight bending of that one joint.
Why I joined the protocol was so that I would
not re-experience what I had experienced 10-12 years ago before I started
the Cayce diet and castor oil packs. The other reason I came was because
some of my clients are doing massage therapy and polarity therapy, had
arthritis, one severely enough to have ankle surgery. So I thought it would
be helpful for them as well. But I think there's a far bigger purpose that
brought me into the protocol, even though it apparently doesn't address
- just part of this whole experience that I had in March.
It was hard to fill out the questionnaires, because
some of the symptoms happened the first two weeks of the month, whereas
the last two weeks it has completely changed for the better.
Sometimes you have to be hit in the head to learn
the lessons that have been hinted at for a long time.
Case 3
Case 3 is a 50-year-old housewife. Her arthritis
symptoms began 4 years before. Her symptoms are primarily in her neck,
and an x-ray in 1998 revealed "major damage to cervical vertebrae." Her
compliance with the protocol was poor. She was not able to return for the
six-month follow-up, but she returned a questionnaire by mail. She reported
some improvement in her condition
On the Osteoarthritis Symptom Assessment, her initial
score was 17, and her score at six months was 15, a 2 point improvement.
Her initial score on the Activity Assessment was 14, and her score at six
months was 7, a 7 point improvement. She reported that her arthritis symptoms
were "improved," and her symptoms other than arthritis were "about the
same." She felt that her arthritis was "less disabling," and that her attitudes
and emotions were "about the same."
Regarding compliance with the protocol, she followed
the diet "occasionally," received massage "A few times since November,"
and followed the Atomidine/Epsom salts bath/massage sequence "A few times
since November." She also received one to three spinal adjustments. This
is poor compliance with the protocol.
She did not return for the 6 month follow-up and
was not interviewed, but submitted the following comments by mail:
Every time I had a massage I had a headache afterwards
and so stopped having them.
For me going on the project at age 50 was not
a very good idea because I had been going through other bodily changes
during this year which have been hard to handle and may explain some of
the difficulties I experienced in Virginia Beach in November. I felt quite
bombarded by the treatments in November - having colonics, massage, Atomidine,
Epsom salts bath and castor oil packs in the course of about 5 days was
pretty disruptive for me. It caused me to feel uncomfortable about the
treatment and therefore was not an incentive to keep it up.
I'm sorry if I was your worst ever participant
in a program. I did benefit from it and am glad I came but I have had to
adapt the measures to my needs. I wish you all well with the research.
Case 4
Case 4 is an 81-year-old retired inventory management
specialist. Her arthritis symptoms began approximately 10 years before.
Her symptoms included pain in the upper back, shoulders and neck. Her compliance
with the protocol was excellent and she reported major improvement.
Case 4 reported that her arthritis symptoms were
"much improved," and her symptoms other than arthritis were "much improved."
She felt that her arthritis was "much less disabling," and that her attitudes
and emotions were "much improved." This case is somewhat puzzling, however,
because these reports were not clearly reflected in the symptom assessments.
For the Osteoarthritis Symptom Assessment, her score went from a 10 in
November to a 9 in May, indicating slight improvement. However, her Activity
Assessment score went from a 4 in November to a 35 in May, indicating a
major deterioration in quality of life. Especially considering her age,
it is possible that other health problems, unrelated to the arthritis,
are bothering her, although she did not mention them in interviews.
Regarding compliance with the protocol, she followed
the diet "most of the time," received massage "Twice every week," and followed
the Atomidine/Epsom salts bath/massage sequence consistently more than
once per month. She also received four or more spinal adjustments. This
is excellent compliance with the protocol.
In the 6 month interview in May, 1999, she said:
I feel that I've improved 90%. The pain between
my shoulders is 90% improved. And I think my circulation has also improved.
I was able to follow the protocol quite well except
the diet. And I eat out a lot, and that interferes with it. I had a little
problem with the colonic, but other than that, I thoroughly enjoyed the
massage twice a week, and the adjustment. It seemed good. The epsom salts
bath, got awfully weak, but afterwards I felt wonderful. Of course I've
been doing the castor oil packs for a long time. I did them according to
schedule. Before I came up here I was doing them more often. But I think
I do just as well once a month, 3 consecutive times once a month.
I think the project is very good, and I would
recommend it to someone else.
Case 5
Case 5 is a 58-year-old environmental consultant.
His arthritis symptoms began approximately 19 years before. His symptoms
included both osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. His compliance with
the protocol was very good, and he had significant improvement at the six-month
return.
On the Rheumatoid Arthritis Symptom Assessment,
his initial score was 17, and his score at six months was 17, yielding
no change. However, his initial score on the Activity Assessment was 18,
and his score at six months was 8, a 10 point improvement in quality of
life. He reported that his arthritis symptoms were "improved," and his
symptoms other than arthritis were "worse," specifically referring to digestive
symptoms. (But see below regarding improvement in headaches.) He felt that
his arthritis was "about the same" degree of disability and that his attitudes
and emotions were "improved."
Regarding compliance with the protocol, he followed
the diet "most of the time," received massage "Almost every week," and
followed the Atomidine/Epsom salts bath/massage sequence consistently more
than once per month. He also received four or more spinal adjustments.
This is excellent compliance with the protocol.
In the 6 month interview in May, 1999, he said:
It's been great doing this work. Probably the
most striking impact I've found, in terms of how I feel, is that I used
to have headaches virtually every day. Those have disappeared totally.
I have not had a headache since November.
In terms of joint pain, probably for 5 ½
months or so, it was roughly the same, perhaps slightly better. Within
the last month, however, the last Atomidine cycle, several joints in the
fingers seem to react adversely and in fact were quite painful. This is
spite of the fact that I continually take medication - 3 tablets of Relefin
per day. This is the first time that has happened since I've undergone
this program.
The one joint where I've noticed a significant
improvement has been in my right hand, the right thumb area, where I used
to do a lot of hammering and this sort of thing. The pain in that is essentially
gone and that joint is quite good. I think probably the other joints have
improved somewhat, but there is still an element of morning stiffness associated
with them, particularly if I have incurred significant stress on them,
perhaps the day before.
Overall, certainly, the program in my view has
been extremely beneficial. The only concerns I've had, one of these started
before this program, is that I seem to get cuts very easily on my hand.
These are very slow to heal. I'm not sure whether it's related to the protocol
or the arthritis, or perhaps to the medication I'm taking for arthritis.
I've also noticed that I have some black circles around my eyes, which
I didn't notice before particularly. They seem to have occurred in the
last month or so.
I have certainly lost weight following this program.
It could be as much as 20 pounds, although I do not have an exact measurement
when we started. My energy has certainly increased substantially since
beginning this program.
Following the protocol itself has indeed been
a challenge. The most difficult aspect, I feel, has certainly been trying
to follow that diet rigorously. To this day I still have difficulty trying
to drink enough water.
The other thing I've noticed in the last month,
is that from time to time, whether this is from overexerting myself or
whatever, but there seems to be back pain just below the ribs, associated
with kidneys or something of that nature. It tends to persist. It's a mild
pain, but it's there. It tends to persist for an hour or so. Maybe this
is all part of the detoxification.
I guess there's another element that's concerned
me a little bit. I don't know what to make of it. It's almost some loss
of sensation in the jaw area. It seems as though there's something going
on in there.
Spiritually, I've certainly become more aware,
but I've certainly done work on my ideals, in terms of the time that's
been available. We're fortunate in Florida that there was an ARE study
group available to us. We indeed participated in that group. Actually to
the extent of twice a week at times. I will continue to do that at home.
There was an Edgar Cayce Conference 2 weeks ago that we participated in.
And a health fair last Saturday where we basically sat at an Edgar Cayce
type booth, and tried to answer information for the public. But somehow
I feel there's still something missing. Maybe it's just that this "walk
the talk" is a little harder than I think it is. It's nice to intellectualize
over all these things, but actually walking the talk is something else.
I still don't feel that I'm doing enough. There's more that I would like
to do, in my mind getting the message out of the Cayce material. I've been
supporting my wife's endeavors, who does quite a bit of work in terms of
setting up study groups.
I consider it a privilege to participate.
From a letter in December, 1999:
In August I visited my rheumatologist.He carefully
assessed my joints.his conclusion was that there was no change from my
previous visit in November, 1998. In fact he suggested that conditions
had worsened slightly as one finger on my left hand had "blown up" in July
and continued to be sore. I was not deterred, however, as I was confident
that day by day my condition was improving, even though I had two sore
fingers.
In September a big change occurred. I had noticed
whenever I got a sinus cold that my arthritic pain would diminish substantially,
if not totally disappear. Well, in September I came down with a cold that
hung on for a considerable period of time. One day in September, I decided,
as I was feeling little or no pain, that I would simply stop taking my
medication. As of this writing I have not resumed my medication. I have
minimal "morning stiffness" and no more soreness in my fingers than when
I was taking the medication. Two days ago, I again visited my rheumatologist
who gave me the results of blood work done in August and his present assessment
of my finger joints. The blood work was essentially normal and the RA factor
was negative. The joints in my hands, with the exception of the two which
were sore, were considered to be "normal."
To say that I was elated is an understatement!
I know that my condition continues to improve, little by little, each day
and certainly by this time next year I am expecting a grand healing to
have occurred.
Case 6
Case 6 is a 54-year-old artist and decorative arts
teacher. Her arthritis symptoms began approximately10 years before. Her
symptoms included quite a lot of morning stiffness and pain, and somewhat
limited motion. Case 6 only submitted daily logs for three months, and
did not return for the follow-up weekend. Based on those three months,
she complied with the diet less than half the time, did the Atomidine sequence
twice a month, but did not consistently do the Epsom salts baths and had
no massages. She also did not respond to the mailed questionnaire. She
is considered a drop-out from the study.
Case 7
Case 7 is a 53-year-old housewife. Her arthritis
symptoms began 2 years before. Her symptoms included somewhat limited motion,
morning stiffness, and quite a lot of pain. She also had a little enlargement/distortion
of her joints, and a little depression and anxiety. She had multiple medical
problems in addition to her arthritis. These included Type II diabetes,
chronic fatigue, restless leg syndrome, high blood pressure, and chronic
urinary tract infections. Her compliance with the protocol was poor, and
her symptoms became worse.
On the Osteoarthritis Symptom Assessment, her initial
score was 17, and her score at six months was 26, which is 9 points worse.
Her initial score on the Activity Assessment was 62, and her score at six
months was 75, which is 13 points worse. She reported that her arthritis
symptoms were "worse," and her symptoms other than arthritis were "about
the same." She felt that her arthritis was "more disabling," and that her
attitudes and emotions were "about the same."
Regarding compliance with the protocol, she followed
the diet "rarely," received massage "A few times since November," and followed
the Atomidine/Epsom salts bath/massage sequence "rarely." She also received
only one to three spinal adjustments. This is poor compliance with the
protocol.
In the 6 month interview in May, 1999, she said:
I really don't know [if I followed the protocol].
I don't think I followed it entirely well. But I guess I've done better
than I thought, because I don't feel a lot of the things. If I'm eating
a lot of the things that I shouldn't be, then I'm not aware of it anyway.
I didn't do as many Epsom salts baths as I could have. The Atomidine was
very easy. I wasn't able to get massages. I think I followed the diet about
60%. I feel pretty much the same as I did 6 months ago.
|